in ,

Sony PS4 AMD graphics vs NVIDIA no-show

As most of you are now well aware, the upcoming next-generation Sony PS4 console will be utilizing graphics chips made by AMD. This is unlike the PS3 which used NVIDIA graphics and now we have some potential answers on the reasons why Sony and NVIDIA didn’t stay in partnership together on the new console.

It has now become apparent that it was NVIDIA themselves that didn’t want to provide chips for the PS4, as a recent interview with Tony Tamasi, NVIDIA’s Senior VP of content and technology has suggested that it is mainly due to financial reasons.

Tamasi has dropped the following quote to GameSpot on why it just wasn’t possible this time around – “We came to the conclusion that we didn’t want to do the business at the price those guys were willing to pay.”

As a result, it now means of course that AMD picked up the contract instead and will be offering x86-64 cores based on the upcoming Jaguar CPU architecture, as well as a Radeon-based GPU on top which could offer a peak performance of 1.84 TFLOPs. NVIDIA has also said in the same interview that working with Sony could have meant losing business in other areas, as they would of had to put other projects on hold to focus solely on Sony’s new console.

We wonder though if Sony had offered more money to NVIDIA, would we have still seen the same quote above from their Senior VP? – We doubt it. Money obviously talks in today’s industry, but time will tell whether AMD can go on to do just a good job as NVIDIA would have, presumably at a fraction of the price.

Considering that NVIDIA provided graphics for the PS3, are you a bit disappointed that they are not on board for the PS4? Are you confident that AMD can deliver the goods consistently once PS4 gets into its stride?

Written by Alan Ng

Alan has been working for Product-Reviews since 2009 and became the Editor-in-chief in 2014. He has a passion for technology, the latest mobile phones and gadgets, and the gaming industry. Alan is a graduate of Canterbury Christ Church University and completed a B.A in Commercial Music in 2008. While expressing a keen interest in all areas that PR cover, you'll usually find Alan in the gaming section, where he'll be keeping enthusiasts up to date on all the latest news and reviews for consoles and PC.

Contact Alan Ng: alan@product-reviews.net

3
Leave a Reply

avatar
3 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
2 Comment authors
Darren HillBom KitinanSacrid Recent comment authors
Darren Hill

Can deliver the goods? Yes. They have shown that they can in the past. Will they? That is a question that won’t have an answer until Launch day.

Either way, it will either bring more popularity to the “underdog” or it might break them. Their success may indeed ride on the coat tails of the PS4.

Bom Kitinan

I for one using amd and it never disappointed me , Nvidia in my ps3 is not that impressive so what the fus is all about ?

Sacrid
Sacrid

The is a mismatched in technology. By going with AMD Sony were able to combine, from what is reported, the GPU and x86 cores in the same package. Which is an very big advantage in terms of packaging. If they went with Nvidia I couple no see AMD and Nvidia working together to put Nvidia GPU in the same package as the AMD x86 processor and I think this is the main reason we are not seeing Nvidia in the PS4. They did not have the IP readily available as AMD. The expense would of come from buying in the… Read more »

Samsung Galaxy S4 vs. S3 specs side-by-side

Samsung Galaxy S4 quick review roundup