in , ,

Modern Warfare 2 Discussion: Claymores vs Bouncing Bettys

Since the release of Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 I have been playing religiously, however one thing that frustrates me is the effectiveness of claymores, especially when compared to Call of Duty: World at War’s bouncing bettys.

When playing game modes such as ‘Search and Destroy’ I felt that bouncing bettys were almost a necessity for World at War, however I feel Modern Warfare 2’s claymores are far less effective.

I think bouncing bettys made game modes a lot more tactical as you could cover entrances to your location, therefore being able to second-guess the opponent, however I feel claymores quite often fail to kill an enemy, which pretty much rules out a reason to use them.

Are you also frustrated by the effectiveness of claymores? Either way let us know your thoughts in the comments section below.

*Identifying Monetised Links - outgoing links that we monetise are marked with an '*' symbol.

Written by Jamie Pert

Jamie has a background in computer repairs and maintenance along with network administration, he now enjoys utilizing the benefits of new technologies and enjoys writing about anything that brings new technology to the world.

He began writing for Product Reviews in mid 2009 and has since expanded his knowledge across a wide-base of devices, he is looking to get more hands-on experience with new devices to gain a better understanding of the latest and greatest technologies.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Modern Warfare 2: Amazon’s Best Selling Item 2009

AT&T Service Down: Are You Affected?