Asus Memo Pad ME102 vs. Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 10.1

By Peter Chubb - Nov 20, 2013

Both ASUS and Samsung are very capable tablet makers, as they have both proven successful with the Nexus 7 and 10, although the former does seem to be a preferred option for Google considering the Nexus 10 2 looks set to have a different manufacturer, with LG considered a firm favorite.

Let us say you are not looking for a Nexus tablet but still want something in the 10-inch range, then you should consider the Asus Memo Pad ME102 or the Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 10.1, as they are pretty similar in terms of specs.

When going over the specs we will mention the Asus Memo Pad ME102 tablet first, with the Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 10.1 second, as this will stop you getting confused.

Firstly there is the display, which is a 10.1-inch LED Backlight IPS panel, compared to TFT touch screen, both of which have a resolution of 1280 X 800. These tablets also come with a 1.6GHz quad-core processor and 16GB of memory.

Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 10.1 offers powerful multitasking capabilities

Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 10.1 offers powerful multitasking capabilities

We said these tablets are very similar in specs and running Android 4.2 Jelly Bean is proof of this. However, there are differences, such as 2-megapixel rear-facing camera and 1.2-megapixel front-facing camera compared to 3MP and 1.3MP.

As for battery life, the Asus Memo Pad ME102 is said to last for 8 hours and the Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 10.1 7-8 hours.

What surprises us the most are the Asus Memo Pad ME102 and Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 10.1 Android tablet prices, as the former is around $100 cheaper than the latter, which is strange when you consider those specs are not that different.

Follow us on Facebook, Twitter or Google Plus.

Also See: Samsung MicroLED Vs OLED TV differences may shock consumers

  • chris

    what a waste of space and time, you suck!

  • Anon

    What the hell was that? Pointless and stupid, wasted my time. Not a review, not an overview, not even a proper specs comparison! Just to generate traffic to this site.

    Never visiting this site again!

  • Laurent

    Can’t believe what I read… The author of this “review” really is a fraud!!! As said before, this is completely void and pointless !! Shame on you Mr Chubb!

  • KDF

    Where is the rest of the review?

  • Jack Dee

    Peter Webb must be the laziest reviewer I have ever encountered. This is not a review and this article it completely pointless. My granny who does not know anything about computers could have done better. Why bother doing this article at all?