2013 Ford Focus ST vs Mazdaspeed3 – Performance specs shootout

When it comes to hot hatches, the Mazdaspeed3 has been one of the best on the market, but Ford has never been far behind, and their 2013 Ford Focus ST could very well challenge Mazda’s new model. The reason we have high hopes for Ford’s latest model is because it’s turbocharged and has many improvements, so how does it compare?

We’ve come across an informative video review where we get to see a 2013 Ford Focus ST vs Mazdaspeed3, where the performance specs are compared to see which of the two has the edge. So let’s look at the all-important facts first.

2013 Ford Focus ST performance specs

A 2.0L Ecoboost engine powers the 2013 Ford Focus ST, which is able to produce 252 horsepower and a 0-60 mph time of just 5.9 seconds. Compare this to the 2013 Mazdaspeed3, with its 2.4-liter engine producing 263 horsepower, although the acceleration is a little slower with a 0-60 mph time of 6.5 seconds.

2013 Mazdaspeed3 performance specs

The reason for this is because the Mazdaspeed3 weighs 3281 pounds, while the ST weighs in at 3223 pounds. The Mazdaspeed3 will achieve 18 mpg city and 25 mpg highway, compared to 23 mpg city and 32 mpg highway for the ST.

The 2013 Mazdaspeed3 looks angry and aggressive, which is what a hot-hatch should be. The ST looks a little more reserved, although that larger grille looks as though it’s ready to suck up the road and spit it out the back.

2013 Ford Focus ST vs Mazdaspeed3 specs

Above we have side-by-side comparison figures of these two vehicles, along with an extensive video review below to see which out of the 2013 Ford Focus ST and Mazdaspeed3 comes out on top.

Written by Peter Chubb

Peter has been writing on Product-Reviews since 2007 and in that time much has changed for him, like his hair having more grey than brown now. He loves gadgets and cars, and gets excited when big events come up, such as CES and the big auto shows.

Contact Peter Chubb:

He started out working in a factory and dreamed of the day when he could become his own boss; That happened back in 2002 and he has never looked back since. Things have changed so much on the Internet in that time, but he has adapted well.

Contact Peter Chubb:

Leave a Reply

3 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
2 Comment authors
AlexChrisJeff Rosenberg Recent comment authors

It seems that the 0-60 times for the MS3 and the ST depend on whom you ask. I’ve read the MS doing 0-60 in 5.7s vs. 5.8s for the ST. (see MotorTrend’s review of both cars). Same of the MPG – some have the MS3 doing 27MPG on the highway, while the ST at 23MPG. Some say the MS3 has a “goofy” look, while the ST has a bass-mouth, cat-fish look…. In the end, what matters is what the driver likes/sees in their MS3 or ST, and few owners will ever say negative things about their “baby”.


The tires are definitely the letdown on the 3 and will more than make up the difference on lap time – . Great review!

Jeff Rosenberg

really good test. these guys really know there stuff

Sonic the Hedgehog Android release with extras

2013 Honda Civic European diesel bests USA hybrid