<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Product Reviews Net &#187; geforce</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.product-reviews.net/tag/geforce/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.product-reviews.net</link>
	<description>News, Reviews and Debates</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 14:00:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>GeForce GTX 550 Ti: NVIDIA Unveils New Mid-Range GPU</title>
		<link>http://www.product-reviews.net/2011/03/15/geforce-gtx-550-ti-nvidia-unveils-new-mid-range-gpu/</link>
		<comments>http://www.product-reviews.net/2011/03/15/geforce-gtx-550-ti-nvidia-unveils-new-mid-range-gpu/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 18:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Cook</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computer Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geforce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NVIDIA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.product-reviews.net/?p=125456</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NVIDIA is responsible for some of the highest quality graphics providers in the market today. Its Tegra 2 GPU has been highly sought after by various mobile device manufacturers and...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NVIDIA is responsible for some of the highest quality graphics providers in the market today. Its Tegra 2 GPU has been highly sought after by various mobile device manufacturers and is recently been reported to be included in the <a href="http://www.product-reviews.net/2011/03/10/samsung%e2%80%99s-galaxy-s-ii-s2-sneaky-peek-preview-and-demo-video/">Samsung Galaxy S II</a>.</p>
<p>Today we have news of another graphics card being announced by NVIDIA, the GeForce GTX 550 Ti. It’s a mid-range GPU that is aimed at those who are not in a position to splash out on their GTX 560 Ti, but is reported to perform better than the GTS 450.</p>
<p>According to the article by Chris Davies at <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/nvidia-geforce-gtx-550-ti-offers-mid-range-grunt-15140025/">Slashgear</a> the first examples of its 1680 x 1050 support will be seen soon. Some of the specs you can expect to see from the GTX 550 Ti are 3D Vision support, good support for DirectX 11, a 1GB of GDDR5 memory, 900MHz graphics clock, a clock speed of 1,800MHz and 192 CUDA cores.</p>
<p>The hardware is expected to cost around $149 according to the article, which can be viewed by clicking the link above. You can also visit <a href="http://www.geforce.com/#/Hardware/GPUs/geforce-gtx-550ti/overview">GeForce.com</a> for more details about the GPU.</p>
<p>What do you think of this mid-range graphics card? Will you be getting one? Let us know in the comments below.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.product-reviews.net/2011/03/15/geforce-gtx-550-ti-nvidia-unveils-new-mid-range-gpu/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GeForce GTX 460 Review: 30 Pages</title>
		<link>http://www.product-reviews.net/2010/07/12/geforce-gtx-460-review-30-pages/</link>
		<comments>http://www.product-reviews.net/2010/07/12/geforce-gtx-460-review-30-pages/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 13:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Chubb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computer Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geforce]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.product-reviews.net/?p=104299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier today you may have seen our post about the GeForce GTX 460, and an official price found via Newegg. In a follow-up, we thought you might want to read...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earlier today you may have seen <a href="http://www.product-reviews.net/2010/07/12/geforce-gtx-460-offcial-price-from-newegg/">our post</a> about the GeForce GTX 460, and an official price found via Newegg. In a follow-up, we thought you might want to read a detailed review of this graphics card.<span id="more-104299"></span></p>
<p>If your looking for a review that thoroughly checks out every area of a card then you will love <a href="http://www.guru3d.com/article/geforce-gtx-460-review/">this article on Guru 3D</a>, which details the GeForce GTX 460 over 30-pages. While NVIDIA’s introduction of the 470/480 wasn’t smooth, this new card has been changed to tackle the problems found in the 1st generation Fermi series.</p>
<p>Guru 3D takes a look at the GTX 460 features and specs, VGA performance under different games, overclocking different versions, the setup, gallery shots, and a lot more over 30 detailed pages.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.product-reviews.net/wp-content/uploads/GeForce-GTX-460-review-2.jpg" alt="" title="GeForce-GTX-460-review-2" width="500" height="402" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-104301" /></p>
<p>In their conclusion they found that the card beat expectations, and raised its own bar to compete with cards way above its class. Read the <a href="http://www.guru3d.com/article/geforce-gtx-460-review/">full review</a>, or jump to the long conclusion <a href="http://www.guru3d.com/article/geforce-gtx-460-review/30">here</a>.</p>
<p><strong>What do you make of the GeForce GTX 460?</strong> Let us know below.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.product-reviews.net/2010/07/12/geforce-gtx-460-review-30-pages/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 24/31 queries in 0.022 seconds using disk

 Served from: www.product-reviews.net @ 2013-05-23 16:06:26 by W3 Total Cache -->