<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Product Reviews Net &#187; esata</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.product-reviews.net/tag/esata/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.product-reviews.net</link>
	<description>Information on the latest gadgets, technology, news and product reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 11:39:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Thunderbolt vs. eSATA: Apple Tech Much Faster</title>
		<link>http://www.product-reviews.net/2011/03/04/thunderbolt-vs-esata-apple-tech-much-faster/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=thunderbolt-vs-esata-apple-tech-much-faster</link>
		<comments>http://www.product-reviews.net/2011/03/04/thunderbolt-vs-esata-apple-tech-much-faster/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 15:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Pert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[esata]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thunderbolt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USB 3.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.product-reviews.net/?p=124054</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You may have read our previous post where we compared USB 3.0 to Apple Thunderbolt, Thunderbolt is twice as fast as USB 3.0 and allows daisy-chaining, therefore we thought we would compare Apple&#8217;s tech to eSATA aka external SATA. As we pointed out previously, Thunderbolt transfers data at a maximum...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may have read our previous post where we compared <a href="http://www.product-reviews.net/2011/02/24/apple-thunderbolt-vs-usb-3-0-speed-comparison/">USB 3.0 to Apple Thunderbolt</a>, Thunderbolt is twice as fast as USB 3.0 and allows daisy-chaining, therefore we thought we would compare Apple&#8217;s tech to eSATA aka external SATA.</p>
<p>As we pointed out previously, Thunderbolt transfers data at a maximum of 10Gbps (in both directions simultaneously), as for eSATA according to <a href="http://www.techradar.com/news/computing-components/peripherals/thunderbolt-vs-usb-3-0-vs-esata-931343">TechRadar</a> eSATA delivers a maximum transfer rate of 3Gbps, therefore Thunderbolt is more than three times as fast, obviously you are not always going to transfer at the maximum rate, however it is obvious that Thunderbolt wipes the floor with eSATA.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.product-reviews.net/tag/usb-30/">USB 3.0</a> is also much faster than eSATA, therefore many people think that the end is nigh for technology which has failed to really impact the market since its launch back in 2004, however if an external version of SATA 3.0 (6Gbps) takes off it means eSATA 3.0 will be faster than USB 3.0.</p>
<p>One thing that may be in eSATA and USB 3.0&#8242;s favor if price, many expect Thunderbolt cables and devices to be extremely expensive, if this is the case perhaps people will prefer the more affordable eSATA or USB 3.0 options, let&#8217;s face is 3Gbps and 5Gbps transfer rates are a lot faster than USB 2.0 and Firewire&#8217;s capabilities.</p>
<p>Do you think eSATA has a future?</p>
<p>More About: <a href="http://www.product-reviews.net/tag/apple/" rel="tag">apple</a>, <a href="http://www.product-reviews.net/tag/esata/" rel="tag">esata</a>, <a href="http://www.product-reviews.net/tag/thunderbolt/" rel="tag">Thunderbolt</a>, <a href="http://www.product-reviews.net/tag/usb-30/" rel="tag">USB 3.0</a></p>
<p style="margin-top:10px;"><i>For more <a href="http://www.product-reviews.net">Product-Reviews.net</a> coverage:</i><ul style="margin-top:0;" class="xoxo"><li><a href="http://www.twitter.com/productreviews" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Follow Product Reviews  on Twitter</a></li><li><a href="http://www.facebook.com/productnews" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Become a Fan on Facebook</a></li><li><a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/productreviewsnet" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Subscribe to PR</a></li><li>Download our free apps for <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/product-reviews/id421120569?mt=8" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">iPhone</a> and <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/product-reviews/id422895325?mt=8" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">iPad</a></li></ul></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.product-reviews.net/2011/03/04/thunderbolt-vs-esata-apple-tech-much-faster/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)

Served from: www.product-reviews.net @ 2012-05-27 00:02:57 -->
