Nokia Lumia 925 camera versus Galaxy S4

By Posted 2 Sep 2013, 09:42

Comparison videos are a great way to get a visual impression of different models and their features and today we are looking at the Nokia Lumia 925 camera versus the Samsung Galaxy S4. With varied features the Galaxy S4 has a 5 inch screen with 1080p resolution, while the Lumia 925 has a 4.5 inch screen with 720p HD resolution.

Nokia Lumia 925 camera versus Galaxy S4

These are just a few differences as far as specs are concerned, as the S4 phone contains a 13 MP camera and 2GB RAM, where the Lumia 925 has an 8.7 Megapixel PureView camera with six Carl Zeiss lenses and 1GB RAM.

To get further insight into how this is perceived we have embedded a video below this article that allows potential customers to see what is on offer and which one is regarded as better. The video by SuperSaf TV lasts around 7 minutes and shows both products using the camera feature to capture the same images in different environments, such as photos taken in low light, indoors and outside with the flash on and off.

As the presenter demonstrates the front and rear facing cameras he also gives us the impression both devices have positives and negatives depending on the environment the pictures are taken in, although we get the impression the presenter feels the S4 camera is better throughout the various images.

While we understand people have their own personal preferences, from what we can make from the video, the Lumina camera is much better in low light, while the S4 does bring out the colours, and the S4 front facing camera is regarded as superior compared to the Lumia 925.

This brings us to our recent post focusing on the Nokia Lumia 925 first look in the UK, as this discusses the 127 Hours movie styled video showing a man with gloves on being trapped under a cupboard with one hand free to use a phone.

In this we are informed that the Lumia 925 has the kind of touchscreen sensitivity that allows users to activate and work this phone without having to remove gloves, which is ideal for those of you who wear them during the winter months.

In regards to the comparison video, which device do you prefer the camera features on?

You can add us to your circle on Google+, follow us on Twitter, join the photo community on Pinterest, or like our Facebook page to keep updated on all the latest news.

  • vitalysimov

    As you see the plastic Sumsung is shaking badly. Nokia FTW!

  • http://www.facebook.com/abdullah.naji1 Abdullah Naji

    Samsung looks more realistic

  • Jonathan Menga

    White balance: Tungsten vs Fluorescent
    Close enough picture quality ( Nokia has more of a crop ratio ” more zoomed in ” – but image quality when closer is better than the Samsung zoom out (check out 2:09)
    Nokia is also better in low light situation as it shows less shadows
    Overall white balance, I prefer the samsungs ( more natural feeling )
    my 2cent.

  • adracamas

    HDR can be a very good tool if your hand is steady enough for it.

Categories