Twitter vs. Path: The Friends Limit

By Updated on

There has been a huge amount of speculation over the months, but Stealth startup Path is now here, and there is talk that this is considered an anti-social network. The reason for this is because it does things a little different to Twitter, as you can have only 50 friends.

Ben Parr from Mashable reports that the total number of 50 was chosen due to Robin Dunbar, a Professor of Evolutionary Psychology. He states the total number of social relationships that we can handle is 150, so makes sense not to go over that limit.

Also See: LFC’s Mario Balotelli attracts Man Utd hate tweets

Having just 50 friends on Path means that you can trust who you post to, as these will be very close to you – although even close friends have a tendency to become a bit nasty. Path went live today for the iPhone, allowing you to share intimate photos with your friends.

The surprise is how you are unable to add a comment to a photo that has been uploaded – well we know how that can get out of hand on Facebook. Question is, is the new approach a winner, or will it fail at the first hurdle?

  • andresdavidovits

    As the co-founder of rrripple.com — I can relate to Path's belief in "Personal networks" (as they mention on their site). That's why for the past two years, we've been leading the charge on the next-generation private sharing site — and not just for photos, but for all media types (photos, videos, links, notes and files). And soon: audio and .swf animations, too. Although our initial focus for our private media sharing site is Education, a large percentage of our users extend beyond this space. Feel free to take a quick look. Our 1 minute video can be seen here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ctyb38U0zzI