Call of Duty 5 World At War: 2 or 3 map packs on way

Filed under: Gaming | By: Alan Ng
Posted on: December 3, 2008 | 318 Comments

Call of Duty 5 World At War: 2 or 3 map packs on way

Daniel Suarez, executive producer for Call of Duty: World at War has said that they aim to bring out two or three map packs out, stating that the DLC will be different and ‘unusual’ to that which gamers received for CoD: Modern Warfare.

In an interview with MTV Multiplayer he went on to say that the updates are ‘not going to be what we’ve done traditionally’ and that they are aiming to deliver something ‘mysterious’. This is sure to excite CoD players all over the world and spark off a speculation campaign.

What we do know though is that the upcoming DLC for the game will be coming at the beginning of the New Year but that is all that Suarez would let out. What do you guys what to see in World at War? Maybe they will fix the lobby problems as an added Christmas present. Let us know your ideas below!

Also see “Should COD5 Zombies become a full spin-off game?

Source: Read

CLICK HERE to keep updated with the latest news, share a comment or problems with products and services. Follow us on twitter or read more news.

Comments

318 Responses to “Call of Duty 5 World At War: 2 or 3 map packs on way”

  1. Ken says:

    get rid of the tanks i think it makes the game suck

    • prime80 says:

      i disagree i luv the tanks, it add a little more to the game technical wise. in real life do u think there wa no tanks?? i like agame that tries to impersonate real life situations.. especiallly being a realism unit it add depth and fun.. play day of defeat source if u hate tanks. you must suck at blowing them up. heres a hint satchel them!! especially if you have a couple of bros help u its done in secs . they arter easy to kill

      • JBH says:

        I like the tanks, but two rocket shots should kill one. I feel that they are sometimes just to hard to take down…Reduce the damage ever so slightly…..

        • Scott says:

          Don’t get me wrong I love the tanks but they are way to strong for hardcore. Just like a players health, tanks should take less damage to kill in hardcore. I would like to also see bouncing betties have a more realistic range. I mean looking at one 10 feet away should not trigger it and kill you.

        • Will says:

          The tanks in COD5 have strong side armor. However, you can easily destroy a tank by using a satchel charge against the top or the bottom. Hide behind a short wall. While the tank drives by, toss a satchel in front of it, then detonate it when the tank rolls over it. I believe that this is an instant kill; I have never failed to destroy a tank in this manner. Sticking the top of a tank (not the turret; the top) yields good results but I am not sure if this is an instant kill.

        • Smith2323 says:

          lol they should come out with world at war 2 thats the best.
          F**K modern warfare 2…

      • rysin says:

        just takes 2 satchel bags to blow them up. just have to do it right above the tanks in the air and they are done. so i dont mind them tanks easy kills for me.

      • adamgregory says:

        i think maybe leave the tanks in but put some 88’s on the levels with tanks, something better to destroy them with.

        • Renegade Raven says:

          Hehe, 88s are great, I remember them from Call of Duty: united Offensive. I agree with implementing these… and maybe give a limited number of shots to each player regarding tanks, and 88s if they put them in.

      • MegaBert says:

        well said, tanks are needed to spice up the game and they are very easy to blow up because i get blown up all the time!!

        • pudge says:

          i think we need much more tanks and jeeps i think they should also put waterand boats on the game

      • ian says:

        i hate tanks take them out there for noobs

        • KES says:

          agree… the tanks s..k!
          the only reason to change my class to destroy them.

          but noobs love to play with them.

        • stfufaggot says:

          Stfu faggot tanks are the s***. You are only crying cause your a retard who keeps getting killed by them f****** asshole.

      • Prvt_Jokerr says:

        i think they should make a map where they have a city/town and the buildings b 3 storyes high and them 2 b blown up alot but be abl 2 use them (all floors) for u who have seen full metal jacket where the sniper is and she takes out 3 men thats how i mean they should make the map

      • Ted says:

        you are a freaking idiot if you think that the tanks make the game more technical. you can barley kill them, they are so overpowered that people get in them and become tank whores. they are stupid and they need to be takin out of the game.

      • lewis says:

        yes there were tanks in world war 2 it dosent make the game suck it makes it more realistic u lot dont appreciate anything these days u should go and look it up if u dont believe me U FAGGOTS

    • dj_hyp3r says:

      tanks suck big fat donkey c*ck
      i dont think they shud take them out the game tho
      just make them less invincible :)
      molotovs shud be more effective against them cos the soviets used molotovs to blow tanks up in war by throwing them at the exhaust basicly blowing them up from the inside out.
      another thing they shud sort out is making sure one team cant control all the tanks cos that bloody does my head in !!

      • Compromise says:

        I think tanks are a good idea, it does add realism into the game.. they just need tweaking a little..

        the damage they do is fine!, because you have to aim quite well for someone who is runnin..

        I think the amount of things needed to take down isnt too bad at times, but if they were to keep the amount of damage it takes, there should be no respwns..

        place say 2/3 tanks in a match, and thats it.. they blow up anad they’re done, because sometimes ppl ride around in tanks kill everyone, then ride to the respwn point and pick up a fresh one, making them too hard to kill.. so they end up with like 25-0..

        but if this happend they would need more than 2 rockets to blow up, because no one would use them..

        but i think there is a sweet spot for a tank.. im not sure wat it is.. it could be on top of the tank, where the gun is.. im not sure.. all i know is i remember being on top of the balcony in seelow, and a tank was next to me.. i threw a sticky grenade and it killed it in one.. it wasnt exactly on fire before i threw it.. it looked pretty pristine.. so im unsure wether i just had stupid good luck or wether there is a spot where u can kill it in one..

        i duno.. but theres my thoughts :)

        • Josh says:

          for all of the people who are complaining about the tanks, atl least they did something different from CoD4. I think they are a really good idea and when the other team has all of them it may even finally make you work as a team.

      • killal says:

        they used molotovs on half tracks not tanks and they should have have half tracks to

    • Sacgoldglove(ps3) says:

      U kno what i dnt lyk, i dnt lyk that the artillery is going in 20 different places lyk u get hurt to the right so u run to the left but it happens to be over there 2 so u die i meen wer uu call it shuld be not in 10 different spots

    • Kyle says:

      Tanks should blow up after two satchels not like 3 or 4 or what ever it is

      • the*wickedben says:

        thats why they have different perks to choose from, say fireworks for example, if u use that, then it will only take 2 satchels to blow the tank up

    • Matt says:

      The problem with the tanks is that they are so unrealistic in how much damage they can take. One bazooka to the rear or top should blow them up everytime, just like real life. Stronger armor on the sides and strongest armor on the front would be just like the way it really was. It would also give infantry better options for destroying them. I don’t know why Treyarch didn’t use this system like they did in the UO expansion to the original one. Tanks were deadly but not godly.

      • ha says:

        Tanks are ok but they need to have more space so the tank can’t sit in one place and hit half the map. Also all you people that think one bazooka to the back of a tank is realistic are fools. In ww2 a german tiger could take at 3 to 6 bazookas to the back and no amount of bazookas could actually kill one from the front or sides. The german tanks outmatched all other tanks in armour and firepower. Speed and numbers was the only advantage the allied tanks had. One tiger could face 6 shermans and take 8 rounds and still operate at full strength, those shermans would be done after one shot from the tiger and the tiger could open fire 400 meters further out which is about 2 or 3 shots off before the shermans could fire.

    • iM tOo S1cK says:

      maybe if you guys were decent at the game you would know how to destroy a tank in one shot. lay a satchel and let the tank run over it and then blow the satchel up. there is no armour under the tank so one satchel will do it. even if the tank is full health. instead of crying about the tanks, just blow them up…

    • Mike Hunt says:

      well i think you suck!

    • adawat says:

      what needs to be with cod5 is when you shoot a dude in the face, he should died not go in to last stand. also get the glithes out. and for the last thing, you should be able to kick down a door in some buildings an houses, that would make the game 10 times better.

    • i think tanks are the worst idea ever and they make the game very unrealistic. In real war there weren’t tanks just sitting around that any soldier could just jump in and kill the enemy.

    • Echelon says:

      They’re hard to take out. But they DID have tanks in WW2. I’d like a playlist where it’s all the game modes without tanks. Maybe an all mercenary playlist also?

    • The Talented 1 says:

      Your all gay SeaRch & DeStroY is The Best all you scrubs are paying TD and HTD get off and play a real game

    • Max says:

      I think they need to get rid of the kill cam!
      You shouldn’t be able to know where the person that killed you is!

      • studaaron says:

        i agree but make it a perk instead of just off altogether. makes you sacrifice to see where a guy is shooting from. and by the way cant MW2 AND WAW2 LIVE TOGETHER IN HARMONY? both are great games.

  2. Daniel says:

    definatly should get rid of the “connection interrupted” and the “host has ended the game”….

    they should just make it like halo and find a new host when the old one leaves, without ending the game

    • I heard from a reliable source that the executive producer of Call of Duty World at War is makeing more levels for Nazi Zombies for Xbox and PS, because the PC version of CoD:WaW Nazi Zombies has over 50 zombie maps. And thats what ae are thinking they are going to let out late Jan.- early Feb.

      xbox live SN: Snowmonster1648

    • G says:

      I agree with the host thing but its not the games fault if you have a bad connection - just upgrade your broadband or move your wi-fi or move it or something like that.

    • U_WILOOZ-PYRO says:

      i agree the “host ended game” and “interupted” is bs. chane the host setting back to the way they had it in call of duty 3

    • maxdensham says:

      Man are you dumb? you can’t “get rid of” connection interupted, that’s what happens when someone has a laggy connection or something with there connection happens.

      dumbass.

    • tim tom says:

      the point of disconnecting during a game is so that the game ends when somebody is using a lag switch

  3. bu11et_pr00f says:

    I think overall they’ve done a really exceptional job with WaW. The dogs and artillery are a bit annoying on smaller maps, but it was the same with choppers and airstrikes in COD4. I think the only thing they could do for once is release some official “sniper only” maps and options, since snipers were once again a big highlight in this game.

    • James 2oo9 says:

      yep well said ive always dreamed of a game of just snipers or not so much specifically sniper maps but like No scopes or like sniper perks and classes only games

  4. Jeff Mazonis says:

    I think that they should add more zombie maps they never get boring along with some new maps for online play also they should make the dogs less vicious get more kills then the helicopter in cod4 but the main item they need is more zombie maps

    • Nick says:

      they have custom zombie maps out… http://www.customcod.com then downloads then to waw maps then it should have listed zombie maps. if any help installing plz reply

      • vortexrap says:

        hes talking about xbox 360 maps. obviously PC users will always get user generated new maps.

        can’t wait for new maps and modes for zombies.

        • Nick says:

          he was… thats shows you my quick reading aint up to scratch srry bout that… feel free to use the website if u c any pc users about that.

  5. Jazor1123 says:

    I agree that there definately should be new zombie maps with buyable perks and maybe more mystery boxes. You should be able to buy a mounted machine gun at certain spots in the level, but it eventually runs out of ammo and u can either buy more or get max ammo. I also think that you should be able to use death cards in zombies, I mean how cool would that be. One of the new militplayer maps should be based on Vendetta or the subway in Eviction.

    • ZombieKing says:

      I agree that there should be alot more Nazi Zombie maps. There should also be the weapons of Russia and Japan giving you a better variety of weapons to use. You just start to get bored with the exactly the same map and weapons.

    • justjont says:

      You can use Death cards on Zombie mode. Just set up a private match with which ever cards you want. Then select the zombie map but DONT press A, press the ‘back’ button on your controller. Hey Presto, zombie mode with death cards!

  6. gibby says:

    Can anyone tell me an actual date of release for a map pack ,as it really does need more maps ,and the lobby probliams need sorting, other from that happy with the game

  7. carl says:

    yeah totally agree with you for perks and new zombie maps, wud be interesting that trying to fend them off with just a few decent guns, i get like 20k points n all i can do is get more lol, wud be awesome if we cud like buy a tank or sommit, or go outside, they cud have something like if u go outside the dogs come for you :),

    yeah death cards wud be good for ten of clubs?(the one were u shoot ur team m8s to revive them,)

    they really need to open this game up, i mean if they made an app so we cud create our own maps and upload them to a server for public people to download them str8 onto there xbox or ps3, wud be awesome,

    • theinformer says:

      u can, justjont explained how to get death cards, u get private match, select death cards, change co-op to nazi zombies co-op but dont press A (on 360) or X (on PS3), press back B (360) or O (PS3) and there u go.

  8. bobby says:

    Yer i agree with bringing out diff different zombie maps that would bring the zombie mode to a new level. also some more large maps. jungle map with loads of hiding spots. Also a warehouse map would be good with different floors three to four floors would be nice.

  9. Sam says:

    HOW DO YOU GET THEM DO YOU HAVE TO GO ONLINE
    YOU SHOULD BE ABLE TO COMLETE ZOMBIE MODE
    I THINK YOU SHOULD GET AN MG OST IN NAZI ZOMBIES

  10. ben says:

    2 words: MORE ZOMBIES!!!

Leave a Reply

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word

 
More
 

Consumer Reviews By Category:
Computing, Electronics, Entertainment, Home & Garden, Motoring, Photography, Sports

Companies and PR Firms

Need a product reviewed, email the details.