Join Product Reviews on        
Mac OS X Leopard’s Time Machine vs Windows Vista Back Up

Mac OS X Leopard’s Time Machine vs Windows Vista Back Up

By: Daniel Chubb | November 24, 2008 | 3 Comments

When disaster strikes with your computer it normally takes that kind of event to make you understand how important backups are and when you lose important files you feel a need to take action so it does not happen again.

This is just what happened to us a few weeks back with our Mac running OS X v10.5 Leopard, shortly after we invested in a Time Capsule and started using Time Machine. Sadly the computers running Windows Vista cannot benefit from Apple’s Time Machine software and only have Vista Backup.

So just how does Time Machine compare to Vista’s backup? This is what we decided to test and while both get the Job done, some seem to go that extra mile in both features and usability.

Time Machine on the Mac is amazing once you have done the first backup, which can take many hours and even failed on its first attempt for us. The back ups are coming in every hour or so now and you would not even know that your files are being backed up.

Restoring files with Time Machine is second to none in style and ease of use, you just go to any directory on the Mac and click the Time Machine icon and the screen scrolls down to show a 3D view of different restore points in the time line. Simple and stylish.

Sadly there is nothing like this for a Windows PC, we used Vista’s built-in backup software that is easy to setup. You can back up files easy enough to an SD card, another device attached to your Windows computer or via the network.

Setting this to daily backups gets the job done and again you do not even know your backup files are being kept up-to-date, although there is nothing like the hour backups and Time Line options in Time Machine but Vista’s basic setup still keeps your important files safe.

Like many of Apple’s products, Time Machine is very stylish and is a breakthrough in automatic backup that’s built right into Mac OS X. It shines better than any other backup software we have used thanks to the painless backing up and really easy way you can restore files directly from folders back hourly for a long time in the past (well since you started backing up).

For Windows users to get anything close they will need Time Machine to be made for Windows computers or someone to design some software as good. At the time of posting this has not been done and we feel Microsoft need to give better built-in options in the next Windows.

What backup software do you use and on what OS?

Follow us on Facebook, Twitter and Google+.

Download our free iPhone and iPad apps, or read more in Hands On.

You may also like...

 
Tags:
  • steve

    Hi,

    I just came across your post and I am a little confused about why a comparison is being made between Apple’s Time Machine and Microsoft’s Vista Backup. Are they not designed for two completely different purposes?

    I use both OSX and Vista and in my experience, Time Machine is more like the Shadow Copy features of windows since before XP, rather than its backup application.

  • Joe

    I agree, Mac users have no idea that Shadow Copies exist on windows which has been around much longer than Time Machine. Now to be fair the benefit Time Machine has over Shadow Copies is that the time machine backups are stored off the machine. But, what good is that, what if your drive crashes? With Time Machine it doesnt really matter if the drive crashes? Not true. Shadow copies stores them only on the local drive. If that drive fails you are screwed. So with either solution you better make a backup of the backup. With Vista and shadowcopies in conjunction with Vista automatic backups you should be somewhat covered. Lesson to learn is make copies of your copies and store them everywhere. Storage is somewhat cheap these days.

  • http://whall.org/blog whall

    While I read the article, I heard myself screaming “Vista has Shadow Copy!!!” and wondering why it wasn’t mentioned at all.

    Then I saw two people already commented for me.

    The article really should be comparing OSX Time Machine to Volume Shadow Copy.

    Now, if VSS had the add-on of being able to point to external media (local USB, FTP, remote file share) and have the system automatically trickle updates of the backups to off-site, then it would have a clear advantage. Oh, and it would rock.

    The problem I have with Time Machine is that it cannot reliably store data offsite. Unless you buy an Apple-specific device (Time Capsule). there are hacks that let you THINK you’re backing up to smb or nfs (a la flux capacitor) but anyone who trusts that is in for a BIG shock when the disk fills up or when they try to restore.