New Hampshire Vote fraud confirmed: Ron Paul votes not counted
Filed under: News, Politics | By: Daniel
Posted on: January 9, 2008 | 42 Comments

We always hear of things going on behind the scenes in politics that do not always come to light, but it looks like New Hampshire vote fraud has been confirmed and some Ron Paul votes have not been counted.
Boston Now is reporting that in Sutton, New Hampshire three members of a family voted for Ron Paul and then they went to the voting map on the Politico website and it said Ron Paul had zero votes in that area.
This is one example of major allegations of vote fraud in New Hampshire, with the aid of Diebold electronic voting machines “Hillary Clinton reversed a mammoth pre-polling deficit to defeat Barack Obama”.
This will cause a major upset and I wonder what can be done now if more information comes to light. Now that 100 percent of precincts are reporting, the map apparently still says zero votes for Ron Paul which you can view on Boston Now and the full story.
CLICK HERE to keep updated with the latest news, share a comment or problems with products and services. Follow us on twitter or read more news.

Ladies and Gentlemen:
Only paper ballots have any true value.
Don’t throw yourself away by voting electronically.
Breaking news, voter fraud verfied in NH, for all the latest details go to http://www.prisonplanet.com if this was not blocked I highly recommend you read all the information.
election fraud happening in the US right now. PLEASE everyone must watch this video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JEzY2tnwExs
show it to everyone you know
If you believe that there was fraud and want to see a recount, go here:
http://grannywarrior.chipin.com/recount
Democracy is done.
http://itpolicy. princeton. edu/voting/
http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=MNYA5ggwG84
This is Princeton University, not some wingnut moonbat conspiracy club.
Many special interests seem to want Hillary to win the Dem nomination. Does this mean there was vote fraud? We don’t know. See the article: “New Hampshire primary results questioned: Electronic voting machines threaten U.S. democracy?” (AmericanChronicle.com, January 11, 2008) at …
http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/viewArticle.asp?articleID=48586
Back to paper votes….NO COMPUTERS….they are fraud waiting to happen!!
hmm Let’s see if I got this right, so the jest of all this is Mr. Paul didn’t get all his votes counted. (He is a republican). So now your trying to say that Debold is in cahoots with Clinton (A Democrat) Debold is owned by extremely stanch republicans. If there were any hanky panky. They damn sure would not have helped Clinton. All of you Conspiracy nuts need to go back to the drawing board, get some facts figured out, and hopefully correct, and try again.
Blow Me wrote:
“They damn sure would not have helped Clinton.”
Go watch the HBO documentary “Hacking Democracy”. It tells that party affiliation is not that important when agendas are set. It’s the persons which can benefit the an entity best that get the help … not the party.
I’d rather be a “conspiracy theorist” than be ignorant of fact. Fact is: Diebold was caught red-handed. To continue to deny this is pure ignorance. I don’t mean that as an insult, but rather in as a literal definition.
Blow Me wrote:
“They damn sure would not have helped Clinton.”
Yes, they would. Parties are not the dividing line here. The parties are illusions created to foment identity politics to keep the citizens at each other throats while the banks, the military industrial complex and large companies strip this country to the bone.