New Hampshire Vote fraud confirmed: Ron Paul votes not counted

Filed under: News, Politics | By: Daniel
Posted on: January 9, 2008 | 42 Comments

New Hampshire Vote fraud
We always hear of things going on behind the scenes in politics that do not always come to light, but it looks like New Hampshire vote fraud has been confirmed and some Ron Paul votes have not been counted.

Boston Now is reporting that in Sutton, New Hampshire three members of a family voted for Ron Paul and then they went to the voting map on the Politico website and it said Ron Paul had zero votes in that area.

This is one example of major allegations of vote fraud in New Hampshire, with the aid of Diebold electronic voting machines “Hillary Clinton reversed a mammoth pre-polling deficit to defeat Barack Obama”.

This will cause a major upset and I wonder what can be done now if more information comes to light. Now that 100 percent of precincts are reporting, the map apparently still says zero votes for Ron Paul which you can view on Boston Now and the full story.

CLICK HERE to keep updated with the latest news, share a comment or problems with products and services. Follow us on twitter or read more news.

Comments

42 Responses to “New Hampshire Vote fraud confirmed: Ron Paul votes not counted”

  1. Cedric says:

    I’m ready for the recount to begin!

  2. Tyranny Bean says:

    countthevotes.org

    sign the petition to congress to throw all electronic ballot machnies out of elections. please … everyone sign. this act has nothing to do with Ron Paul and everything to do with a fair election!!!!!

  3. Rexy says:

    this is not a good example coming from a leading country in the globe.
    shall we do as it says” Do as we say but not as we do”
    No wonder theres so much trouble now with the world suffering from wars and crimes..
    It looks like America is a leader to everything, the good,the bad and the ugly..
    May God bless the world not America!

  4. Jim S says:

    I’m sure he did better. I have gotten calls all day from folks in NH that say they dont know anyone who voted for anyone other than Oboma and Ron Paul at all….

  5. Jason says:

    Does anyone really believe that somehow Hillary managed to come from being double digits down in the polls to winning the NH primary? I don’t, I believe there was major vote fraud going on in NH all across the boards. Part of it could be the Bradley effect, but I believe that Obama supporters are much like Paulians in how they are comditted to their candidate. No I suspect the old girls called in some political favors. A recount must be demanded in New Hampshire.

  6. cowbot says:

    America is the leader in binary black/white thinking, in self idolatry, in hyperbolic rhetoric and in knee-jerk jackbooted jingoistic hypernationalism.

    Proof: McCain ‘million years in iraq’ wins NH.

  7. Kurt says:

    I wish they would just come on out and tell us who they have chosen to be president so we don’t have to do all this fake voting crap.

    Do you think Diebold has a vested interest in the outcome of the election… I wonder if Ron Paul was elected would there be electronic machines in the next election.. ?

    I hear the sounds of…. Revolution….

  8. Caitlin says:

    Why is the mainstream media suppressing the growing evidence and outrage surrounding the faulty Diebold voting machines used in the elections?? Never have so many polls been so wrong and it’s not because voters were saying one thing and doing another, it was because the machines used in the voting system are extremely easily hacked and have been proven corrupt as you can see in the HBO documentary “Hacking Democracy” watch it on youtube or google video. There is a mountain of evidence that the voting electronic voting system cannot be trusted. please have a look at these links:

    http://presscue.com/node/38034

    http://www.commondreams.org/headlines03/0828-08.htm

    Diebold is a corrupt private organization that has records of receiving money from the republican party, as well as a CEO who has pledged in an uncovered memo to “deliver the vote to the republican party” in the 2004 elections. The united states is the only nation to have polls be so unbelievably inaccurate. this happened in 2000, in 2004 and now in 2008.

    Hillary will be fraudulently nominated because she will be the easiest to take down in the election. all they need is a tight race, if Obama continues the level of support from both the democrats and republicans as we’ve seen, it will be harder to justify the fraudulent results.

    PLEASE if you are truly a patriotic American, watch the documentary and demand coverage in the media and a formal investigation!!

    this is NOT democracy.

  9. Talcott says:

    If these machines can’t be audited,

    what do we have left….pitchforks?

Leave a Reply

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word

 
More
 

Consumer Reviews By Category:
Computing, Electronics, Entertainment, Home & Garden, Motoring, Photography, Sports

Companies and PR Firms

Need a product reviewed, email the details.