Stand Corrected on Muiltiplayer: Xbox 360’s Halo 3 better than Sony PS3’s Warhawk
Filed under: Gaming, Sony Playstation 3, Xbox 360 | By: Daniel
Posted on: October 4, 2007 | 26 Comments
When I started playing Warhawk on my Sony PS3 I was taken back by how good it is and how large the maps were, yes its still amazing and I love being able to fly high and drop fast towards the ants (other players)…simply amazing.
Then I got Halo 3 on my Xbox 360 and as I voiced before, my first thoughts were “amazing graphics but hate the tiny maps in comparison to Warhawk’s”.
Since I have been playing Halo 3 a lot more I have now come to understand that bigger muiltiplayer maps does not make a better game, in fact the gaming options and many different types of games and customizing in Halo 3 sets it apart from Warhawk.
Yes I still love Warhawk and play it often, but I have now come to learn how much fun it is to go into a private chat and then team up with my mate while we play Halo 3 team games (this you could never do on the Sony PS3 as the chat software is very limited).
Warhawk has its benefits, but I do stand corrected thinking it was a better muiltiplayer game.
For me now Halo 3 is way better, but still I am glad I own both the Xbox 360 and Sony Playstation 3.
CLICK HERE to keep updated with the latest news, share a comment or problems with products and services. Follow us on twitter or read more news.
Dan, first of all halo does not include user created content, its user “EDITED” content. Also warhawk is muliplayer only so there is no reason to compare halo 3 to warhawk as far as story goes, plus halo’s story sucked and i’m hearing that even from halo fans. And also resistance had a damn good story for the ps3, it wasn’t short nor long, and the multi-player online for that game freakin rocked. Did xbox have that kind of option for a game? NO! lol. And also the aliens in resistance are the first of their kind, besides, sony devs. didn’t make that game, insomniac games did.
This whole article plus it’s predecessor was a set up to make Halo3 look better than it actually is don’t believe this garbage ., you’ll get more play out of Warhawk and for half the price considering you already have a ps3. If you are stuck with 360 then Halo3 is worth it for you
Halo is the same small battle over and over with 7 or 8 bad guys with different backrounds and it’s over. Environments are not destructable at all and your weapons dont leave a mark in anything…………. Halo looks dead compaired to WARHAWK……. I get bored with Halo 3 and I get worn out playing Warhawk with all the adrenaline rush.
LMFAO!!! wow like said above how can you say that the chat is limited on the ps3? it comes with a free headset…you obviuslly dont play warhawk that often :/ u have such small maps on halo3 it’s not even fun and it gets boring fast warhawk has like 20 mile maps(I am exagerating) for a complete whole gaming experience….u need to get off the bandwagon and face the facts like a man/woman (i have a 360 also and i like ps3 alot more)
What a joke! Its 2008 and people are still debating LIVE vs the PS Network?? The verdict is in people! PSN is a baby developing in the womb while LIVE is 5 years out and just starting to really grow some balls!
If graphics mattered as much as $ony would have you believe then the XBOX or Dreamcast should have destroyed PS2. Fact is that it’s ONLINE that people want b/c re-playability is exponentially increased with on-line play. Too bad $ony missed the boat and wasted thei development dollars on Blu-ray instead on an on-line infrastructure…
Oh please Halo 3 lags online Live sucks Warhawk is lag free and also free to play online. Is way more fun then Halo 3 will ever stop being such fanboy and admit you love Warhawk like everyone else Xbox owner like to brag just about 3 games PS3 owner can brag about 50 games perfect exclusive Lol u know u love PlayStation 1 2 3 PSP PSX Halo 3 was not that big of a hit dindt help to sell the damn bad system lol.