Read Clearly: Talking Multiplayer, Sony PS3’s Warhawk better than Xbox 360’s Halo 3
Filed under: Gaming, Sony Playstation 3, Xbox 360 | By: Daniel
Posted on: September 28, 2007 | 52 Comments
I am finding this really hard to believe that people are not reading clearly the topic, as in my last post about the multiplayer maps on Warhawk vs Halo 3.
Gamers just always want to go back to the Sony PS3 vs the Xbox 360, move on people as we are talking “Multiplayer Gameplay”, by that I am talking 10, 20 and 30 people.
Let’s see if this time gamers cannot mention the word “Campaign”, why would I say that…well as:
1) Warhawk has no Campaign, its only Multiplayer.
2) We are talking Multiplayer, which Halo 3 and Warhawk have.
Yes I agree Halo 3 is fantastic at its campaign and co-op campaigns, I personally played the co-op campaign for over 4 hours yesterday with a friend 100 miles away and it was brilliant.
I just cannot believe why the comments of gamers keep jumping back to campaign or Xbox 360 vs Sony PS3, when what we are talking about is the massive multiplayer in Halo 3 and Warhawk not the campaigns.
Surely you can agree if you have played the massive multiplayer games on Halo and Warhawk, that Warhawk’s is by far superior in gameplay.
Well that’s my opinion, but feel free to voice your opinion on THE MULTIPLAYER side of the games.
I am not saying Warhawk is better overall; I am trying to explain how the multiplayer element in Warhawk is second to none.
In Short:
Halo 3: best co-op campaign and single player campaigns I have played in a while
Warhawk: best multiplayer game I have ever played
CLICK HERE to keep updated with the latest news, share a comment or problems with products and services. Follow us on twitter or read more news.
I strongly disagree. Halo 3 has much better online. Brilliant matchmaking and a good level system to create fair games makes getting into an appropriate match easy. Then there is the game itself. Halo 3 has proven to be even much better than Halo 2 in its multiplayer. And more time has been spent by people playing Halo 2 online than time has been spent playing all Playstation games online together (and I am not just talking PS3). I think Halo 3’s biggest problem is it will negatively affect software sales, as I need almost no other games to supplement my Halo 3 for a long time. Assassin’s Creed, GTA IV, and Fable 2 are ones I plan to get in the next year, but I do not know how I will even find time for that small amount of games between living my life and playing Halo 3.
You will never get the Halo3 loving crowd to admit that anything could be better than Halo3, it’s in their Microsoft programming. MUST LOVE HALO, MUST KILL PS3 ON EVERY FORUM, MUST LOVE HALO, MUST SPEND MORE MICROSOFT MONEY…
Halo 3 graphics are good, Halo 3 matchmaking and ways to create fair games is good, but Halo 3 multiplayer cannot compare to Warhawks 32 players playing to the highest heights and big maps.
Top that of with the gameplay, its just amazing.
Halo 3 would win for me if the maps were much bigger and you could go to many more places while in a 30 player match.
Why even have this discussion. Warhawk SHOULD have better multiplayer, because that’s all it has–and they’re charging $60 for that game and a bad headset. In my mind, the two games don’t even compare. Halo 3 all the way.
This is silly. Most gamers have either Xbox 360 or PS3 but not both, so few gamers have both consoles and are able to play both Halo 3 and Warhawk and properly compare them.
Also, Halo 3 has just come out, so Halo players are too busy playing Halo 3 right now to comment here.
To be fare to Halo you have to remember that some time had to be spent on the campaign so the developer couldn’t put all there efforts into the multiplayer. Multiplayer is the only existence that Warhawk has and thats why its better than Halo in that category of game play.
The only thing i can say is that they’re not the same type of online game. I believe both are very good - BUT - if you say that Warhawk is the best online game you’ve ever played, that can only mean that you’ve not played the Battlefield series !!!
I have a PS3 and my roommate has a PS3 and 2 360’s with two copies of Halo 3. I have played both Warhawk and Halo 3 A LOT. Let me tell you that Warhawk is better multiplayer. Halo 3 is extremely fun but Warhawk is more fun and more to do in my opinion.
It’s easier to get onto a match with Halo but they are fixing that with Warhawk. So I would give Warhawk the edge over Halo 3 since its more fun.
warhawk multiplayer is much better.it is more fun to play and u have a huge enviroment to batle.u can fly in the warhawk in open sky as far as u want.halo is a small map hyped game.
If warhawk is better, then why is not out selling halo3?