Xbox 360 Halo 3 and Sony PS3 Warhawk at war: How can you compare?
Filed under: Gaming, Sony Playstation 3, Xbox 360 | By: Mark
Posted on: September 27, 2007 | 103 Comments
After seeing the post from Daniel Multiplayer Maps: Halo 3 on Xbox 360 vs. Warhawk on Sony PS3 prompt me to argue this point, how the hell can you choose which one is better when they are totally different platforms, like many of you fanboys it seems that there will always be a war if you like it not which to me is pretty pathetic.
Just to put my oar in, I really do think Halo 3 is the nuts and have played Warhawk and also say that is a great game but how far do we go to get all the best games, should we go out and buy every single console in bloody existents, do not think so not at their prices any way.
Please explain to me the differences between Halo 3 on the Microsoft Xbox 360 and Warhawk on the Sony PS3 I would love to know, oh and please do not slag of other consoles there is no need.
CLICK HERE to keep updated with the latest news, share a comment or problems with products and services. Follow us on twitter or read more news.
Personally I can’t eve ncomment on warhawk beacause I’ve never played it but I still can say this.
STOP FUCKING BASHING ON GINA YOU WHORES!
God you guys are fucking idiots. seriously.
Hello personally gina dont know what he is taking about he is fucking stupid.
\”Warhawk’s solo campaign is about 8-12 hours shorter than Halo 3’s. \”
That is easily the best comment on this page, I actually laughed out loud. Everyone spazzing out because Warhawk doesn\’t have a campaign have no sense of humor.
Warhawk has a very active community. I can go online and play against tons of people, and I can do it for free. Yes, there are people running empty servers, sony also runs very active servers. Also, some ppl complaing about not enough ppl, change your filter settings, at any given time there are probably at least 50 active games of 8+ ppl, and about another 100 or so with 8 or less.
I\’ve beaten Halo 3 at my friend\’s place, yes, multi player campaigns are nice, but playing online is much better, especially when all players don\’t need Xbox accounts to play from 1 console.
Also in Warhawk, you can blow up vehicles my continuously shooting them. In Halo you have to kill the driver, which is stupid when you are shooting Ghost Vehicles with weaker weapons and that vehicle won\’t blow up. I played a round where this guy kept killing 3 of us with a ghost, none of us could get ahold of the 1 rocket laucher, and the guy kept on mowing us down. No number of assult rifle bullets could blow him up, so he won the round because his stupid little ghost didn\’t take dmg.
A group of 4 of us played Halo 3 a lot, recently when I got a PS3 we\’ve switched to Warhawk for several of the below reasons.
I personally prefer Warhawk with the expansion packs, it only has 8 different maps, but each map has about 8 different modes of play. I also find Warhawk to be less glitchy, although it does have its issues when a tank gets stuck on a rock. At least in Warhawk I\’ve never witnessed someone phasing through a rocket. That\’s right, in Halo 3, I\’ve seen people phase through a rocket, then double checked it from every vangtage point in instant replay.
Warhawk had some kind of glitch were you could shoot through a mountain, I think that\’s fixed, but every now and then I wonder.
In Halo 3, a close by hand grenade won\’t kill you unless it\’s a sticky that landed on you. I find this silly, since a grenade that hit your foot and blew up won\’t kill you. This was not a problem in Halo 1. In Warhawk, that\’s not an issue, if a grenade blows up next to you, you\’re dead.
Also since the Warhawk Co-Op is big enough to play with others who have split screen enabled, you can play with your friends against other ppl w/o having a friend that\’s a screen watching bitch.