Xbox 360 Halo 3 and Sony PS3 Warhawk at war: How can you compare?
Filed under: Gaming, Sony Playstation 3, Xbox 360 | By: Mark
Posted on: September 27, 2007 | 103 Comments
After seeing the post from Daniel Multiplayer Maps: Halo 3 on Xbox 360 vs. Warhawk on Sony PS3 prompt me to argue this point, how the hell can you choose which one is better when they are totally different platforms, like many of you fanboys it seems that there will always be a war if you like it not which to me is pretty pathetic.
Just to put my oar in, I really do think Halo 3 is the nuts and have played Warhawk and also say that is a great game but how far do we go to get all the best games, should we go out and buy every single console in bloody existents, do not think so not at their prices any way.
Please explain to me the differences between Halo 3 on the Microsoft Xbox 360 and Warhawk on the Sony PS3 I would love to know, oh and please do not slag of other consoles there is no need.
CLICK HERE to keep updated with the latest news, share a comment or problems with products and services. Follow us on twitter or read more news.
warhawk sucks halo 3 is the shit
Halo 3 is boring and looks last gen
Warhawk is one of the best multiplayer games ever created with fast and fluid gameplay and much more diversity than Galo 3
Warhawk’s solo campaign is about 8-12 hours shorter than Halo 3’s. And if you think the Halo 3 story sucks…
Gina ure stupid. warhawk doesnt even have an single player.its ONLINE only.and halo3 story sucks too hard. same stuff repeated over and over again…
What are you talking about Gina? Warhawk doesn’t have solo campaign. Warhawk is a online only game and it’s one of the best multiplayer games out there. You’re able to fly warhawks, drive jeeps, tanks, and man gunning stations. There’s so much action going on, the graphics are not as good as halo, but the action is probably more stimulating.
warhawk has no single player campaign. It is purely a multiplayer game, it evens says it on the cover. That makes it nearly impossible to compare with. there is no single player mode and thats way its so cheap.
i have played halo3 and seriously, its good, but id prefer to play warhawk or unreal tournament 3 when that comes out.
I have both and Warhawk is a nice game but the lack of community really shows up in that game. Half the poeple dont even have microphones this really takes away from the team aspect. Halo 3 I like alot more but its not a perfect game either. IMO the xbox will 9 out of 10 times be better online because of xbox live. You have heard the old saying you get what you pay for and with sonys online stance its free but it is so lacking I doubt anyone would pay for their service.
So Chris your saying that the xbox360 is not the better machinebecause it’s cost is less than the ps3. I guess you do get what you pay for RROD!!
WTF?
why do people slate each other I will never know, I’m shure both games (like all) have good and bad points & for starters ones an FPS the other is a TPS….so the question : “How can they compare Warhawk to Halo 3…..My answer, cos they are noobs!.
Those two games are very hard to be even compared, but Halo3 in overall is better because it ads the single player.On WarHawk case, very few gamers play it online, it`s anoying like that, dispite the very good aspect of the game.
But even thow is a very stupid comparison