Warhawk on Sony PS3 vs Halo 3 on Xbox 360
Filed under: Gaming, Sony Playstation 3, Xbox 360 | By: Daniel
Posted on: September 23, 2007 | 136 Comments
This is a very interesting match up and we are talking only online multiplayer gaming as Warhawk has no single player gameplay.
I have been addicted to playing Warhawk on my Sony PS3 since the day it came out, and for people that have played it for 2 minutes and then judged Warhawk (get back playing your missing out).
The game is amazing and the way the developers have let you jump into an aircraft and jet away in seconds is wicked, nice range of vehicles (could be a lot more, maybe an expansion) and it does what it’s dedicated to extremely well…online gaming.
Then we come to Halo 3 on Xbox 360, this is one game I am really looking forward to getting my hands on in 2 days (I can see my 360 gaming time going up).
I cannot comment too much on Halo 3 YET, as I have not had that many gaming hours on the game.
So, let’s see which you think is better. Warhawk on Sony PS3 vs Halo 3 on Xbox 360.
Which game do you think is better and why?
CLICK HERE to keep updated with the latest news, share a comment or problems with products and services. Follow us on twitter or read more news.
Have ps3 & 360………….girlfriend & I play ps3…………..she’s scared of 360…………..she sux balls………….warhawk sux balls…………..all hail MASTER CHIEF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! All u ps3 fanboyz r n00b5!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Having both a PS3 and a 360, I have enjoyed Warhawk far more than the Halo3 beta, I don’t think Bungie have done anything considerable since the beta.
In my eyes, Warhawk on PS3 is definately the superior game.
PS3 Warhawk wins by a long mile, it’s got much more playability and longetivity.
this question would have been better asked a week from now, but, i’ll say warhawk, i didn’t enjoy the halo 3 beta, but who knows, might b better now, but no one has halo until tuesday, so your question is like asking, which is better? this product that is out or this product that you haven’t played yet
Hello folks. Another pathetic article. Please don’t insult our intelligence by trying to put Warcawk on the same level as Halo 3, or should I say, trying to put Halo 3 down on the same level as that joke of a game.
Are you people so fan based that you will say anything to save your PS3’s from being doomed. I spend £40 ($80) on warhawk and felt so ripped off that it made me feel angry towards Sony for letting it be released as it was. I waited months for a good game for my PS3 after playing the two games I get with it, yes I should have done a little more reading about the game I admit but I listened to Sony at E3 and all the hype and got it. As a Multi-player is OK not good but not bad, but where is the game !!!!. I could have kepted playing Battlefield which is so much better and that would have been free….
The only reason we are comparing H3 to WH on multiplayer alone is because thats all it has, which is a crime… when I spend £40 I expect a full game. You wouldn’t go to the Cinima and just whatch the end credits now would you.. and you all say oohh “warhawk is miles a head” talk sensable its crap and we were all ripped of and nice Sony are sat there saying they are that desperate for games they will by any old rubbish and we do…. at least MS have got a good game that will be worth the £40 I will pay for it.. Also the PS3 online is shocking lets hope Home is better if they ever release it… I suppose you get what you pay for
are u retarded? halo has the best single player. period. i didn’t even have halo online and it was still my favorite game of all time without the multiplayer. also, too answer quintons bull**** post master chief’s name is actually john so shove that up your halo hating @$$.
How can you say that Halo 3 has tired gameplay, but Battlefield has done what warhawk has been doing for along time. Battlefield 1942, Battlefield Vietnam, Battlefield 2142, Battlefield 2: Special Forces, Battlefield Euro Force, Battlefield Armored Fury. So I would say Warhawk is looking more tired than Halo 3. In all fairness this is the dumbest comparison I have seen thus far. One game is totally mp the other is not, Halo 3 isnt even out.
Okay you xbox 360 fanboys are over the top. Halo 3 has become the looney tunes of FPS. It is a joke now. Geez get blown up and fly through the air like you have launch by a cannon. Get shot and the rag dolling effect is silly. It has just been over done on effects that did not need to be enhanced what needed fixing was the game play is is boring and the only thing I could gleen from the beta was they have made it more difficult by throwing more enemies at us. No Halo 3 is over cooked. Is is a shame it could have been something so much better.
Warhawks brilliance is its well laid out strategic play and various modes of attack. It is simple and therein lies the genius of it.
Warhawk vs Halo 3?
You must be kidding, right?
Halo fanboys, don’t waste your time with this…
Sony fanboys, don’t be ridiculous, Warhawk? lol, keep dreaming.