Iraq Veteran and Demolitions “Expert” Claims 9/11 An Inside Job

You’re right. The problem with most inside job conspiracy theories regarding 9/11 is that the majority of them were cooked up by angry white males in the weeks and months after 9/11 and all had something to do with how “impossible” it was for “19 arabs” to pull off, but somehow it was easy for the white anglo saxon protestant male in the White House to orchestrate with impunity.

We’ve since learned that the “great white father” in the oval office is really the little man behind the curtain who couldn’t “find” a single tractor trailer load of WMD in a hundred thousand square miles of Iraqi desert. Which by itself would have justified the entire Iraq war.

Meanwhile, 6 years have gone by and “9/11Truth” and all the other wacko inside job variants have more in common with “UFOTruth”, “JFKAssassinationTruth”, “HolocaustDenialTruth”, and “MoonLandingswereaHoaxTruth” than anything that actually can be demonstrated by historical evidence or scientific research.

‘Can’t see past the planes, eh?
Controlled demolishion, guys. WCT7 did not fall toward it’s wound. Concrete to dust. For Christ’s sake, wake up by now.

For those in denial :

http://www.tvnewslies.org/html/refusing_the_9_11_evidence.html

Roll on the day when those truly responsible come to ‘light’. If the government weren’t directly responsible, then they were certainly part of a conspiracy themselves…

9/11 – The Twin Towers and Common Sense
http://journalof911studies.com/letters/g/CraneAndCommonSenseByFrankLegge.pdf
By Frank Legge, Ph.D.

Before the roof of the North tower of the World Trade Centre became hidden in dust it was falling at a rate which would have brought it to the ground in 10.5 seconds. The US administration expects us to believe that this fall rate is reasonable for a fire and plane damaged building. For comparison the roof on the right in this drawing, freely falling in a vacuum, would take 9.2 seconds.

Thanks to Joe Plummer of Stop the Lie for this thought-provoking drawing.

http://stopthelie.com/fire_initiated_collapse.html
Data published by NIST shows that the steel was not hot enough for the collapse to begin. There are also engineers who have worked out that, even if collapse did begin at the damaged level, it would not continue, but would quickly come to a halt.

That may be hard to validate, unless you can deal with complex calculations, but what about this time difference, just 1.3 seconds? Does not ordinary common sense tell you that the block on the left will be slowed down if it has to crush its way through over 90 storeys of cold steel and concrete? Would it not take more than 1.3 seconds longer than the one on the right, freely falling?

Does this not imply that the undamaged, unheated lower part of the building suddenly lost structural strength in some way? Is there any explanation other than explosives that could account for this sudden loss of strength?

No steel framed building has ever collapsed due to fire except on that day, when three tall buildings came down, and they came down impossibly fast.

One of these three buildings, WTC 7, was not hit by a plane and showed little evidence of fire. It took no more than half a second longer than free fall to collapse. This building was occupied by the FBI, the CIA and the DoD. Is it feasible that al-Qaeda could have got past all these sensitive organizations to lay explosives without inside help?

It is instructive to note that there were four other buildings at the WTC which were badly damaged by fire and falling debris but behaved in the usual way: they did not collapse.

To locate peer reviewed papers which substantiate these claims see: http://journalof911studies.com/
Frank Legge

http://journalof911studies.com/letters/g/CraneAndCommonSenseByFrankLegge.pdf

===

THERE ARE THOUSANDS OF 9-11 WEBSITES (GOOGLE IT) THAT PROVE THAT THE BUSH/PNAC
ADMINSTRATION PLANNED AND ORCHESTRATED 9-11…HERES A FEW OF THEM

http://www.scholarsfortruth911.org/
http://911blogger.com/
http://www.reopen911.org/
http://www.geocities.com/killtown/
http://www.standdown.net/
http://www.911truth.org/
http://thewebfairy.com/killtown/911links.html
http://www.tvnewslies.org
http://www.prisonplanet.com/911.html
http://stopthelie.com/home.html
http://www.911proof.com/
http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com
http://911research.wtc7.net/
http://www.PatriotsQuestion911.com
http://www.legitgov.org/index.html#breaking_news
http://ae911truth.org/

A new page, featuring statements from more than 140 Engineers and Architects, has been added to http://PatriotsQuestion911.com

The site now features statements by more than 500 credible individuals that question or contradict the official account of 9/11, with more being added all the time. They include:

100+ Senior Military Officers, Intelligence Services and Law Enforcement Veterans, and Government Officials
140+ Engineers and Architects

130+ Professors
100+ 9/11 Survivors and Victim Family Members
70+ Entertainment and Media Professionals

The direct link to the new page is http://PatriotsQuestion911.com/engineers.html

Your countrymen have been murdered and the more you delve into it the more it looks as though they were murdered by our government, who used it as an excuse to murder other people thousands of miles away.
If you ridicule others who have sincere doubts and who know factual information that directly contradicts the official report and who want explanations from those who hold the keys to our government, and have motive, means, and opportunity to pull off a 9/11, but you are too lazy or fearful, or … to check into the facts yourself, what does that make you?
Full Statement of Lt. Col. Shelton F. Lankford, US Marine Corps (ret)
Retired U.S. Marine Corps Fighter Pilot
February 20, 2007

http://www.patriotsquestion911.com/Statement%20Lankford.html

UNANSWERED 9/11 MIRACLES (http://www.opednews.com/articles/life_a_allen_l__070727_unanswered_9_2f11_mira.htm)

Read that and forever shut up. That is, any more word from you in the same vein as above and you will be counted among the bigotted and/or congenitally stupid. (In the Middle Ages people were burnt at the stake because there was “no evidence” that the Earth moves around the Sun.)

By the way, Kennedy was shot from the front and not from the back, where L.H. Oswald was. Also, in 1969 there were no microprocessors – computers one thousandth the strength of your laptop were masive and took up an entire office floor. Computers on board are absolutely necessary for process control, that is, NASA COULDN’T HAVE put a man on the moon! But let’s stick with the current “conspiracy”, which implicates your Admistration as being murderers of their own citizens. The finger points to them: They did that false flag operation to have an excuse to start murdering in the Middle East. You see, a “consipracy” implies free men freely agreeing to keep quiet about something. The people involved weren’t free. They no doubt got a lot of money for their cooperation, but were also told that if they breathed a word, they’d be murdered – “in the national interest”, of course.

Marvellous thing, the Internet. The truth spreads fast, while things are still hot. Unlike in Hitler’s Reichstag’s days, when it took post-war historians to uncover the truth.

Robert_Hoogenboom@leftfoot.com.au
Sydney, Australia

Review all the evidence with an open mind. There is a lot of bull out there. You have to separate the wheat from the chaff. I recommend ae911truth.org for starters. The truth may be painful but it is preferable to denial based on a pre-conceived ideology. Denial is detrimental to everyone.

I have been researching 9/11 for over four years and there are serious unanswered questions from that day, I will propose 5. I hope you investigate these for yourself… 1) Never in the history of steel structures has a building collapsed from fire yet 3 did on 9/11; WTC tower 1,2 & 7. All three buildings came down at free fall speed with no resistance; tower 7 was never hit by an airplane yet came down symmetrically in seven seconds? Additionally odd, tower 2 fell before tower 1 although tower 1 was hit first and tower 2 was hit with a glancing blow. The explosion/ collapse in tower 2 started above where the plane hit the tower? Jet fuel burns at only about 1500 Degrees Fahrenheit in the open air and structural steel does not melt or even get significantly weakened until more than a thousand degrees hotter with a melting point of near 3300 degrees F. 2) There is no large plane wreckage in front of the Pentagon from the 757 that hit it. Taking from the official story, the 757 that hit the pentagon flew over a highway, parallel and 5 to 10 feet above the ground and impacted the pentagon between the 1st and 2nd floor. You can see the video the pentagon released here, notice how the 757 is only flying several feet above the ground- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TAaP4Z3zls8 (official story) The airplane did not leave any markings or large debris (ex wings) on the front of the pentagon. the 757 supposedly was sucked into a 16ft by 24ft hole, before the ceiling collapsed a 1/2 hour later, and incinerated. how did this plane hit only 15 ft above the ground after descending so rapidly without ever hitting the ground and flown by an amateur pilot? The 3 slides the pentagon released to the public shows a small shaped device flying horizontally, very low to the ground and leaving a small smoke trail. Just recently Pilots for 9/11 Truth, an international organization of pilots and aviation professionals, petitioned the National Transportation and Safety Board (NTSB) in regards to the flight data recovered from Flight 77. The data provided by the NTSB contradicts the flight path given by the 9/11 commission report. The flight data that the NTSB provided shows the 757 that hit the pentagon at 300 feet above the highway and could not have clipped the light poles and subsequently struck the pentagon between the first and second floor. Please see the article here- http://www.axisoflogic.com/artman/publish/article_24288.shtml . How come the Pentagon has not released video from the cameras mounted on the roof? lastly, after traveling through three rings of the Pentagon, the plane or whatever it was left a small circular exit hole in the third ring. 3. All four hijacked planes flew for an average of 40 minutes, 1 hour 50 minutes total, without any fighter jet intercept over NY and Washington. As you are aware, NY and Washington are some of the most protected airspace in the world. 4. Where is the plane wreckage from the plane crash in Shanksville, PA? in pictures and video all you see is a small ditch with no fires, plane debris, seats, bodies, etc.? 5. How was the Patriot Act and the War on Terror so quickly developed after 9/11? Was this new program a reaction to 9/11 or something that was worked on before September 11th and just conveniently ready for a terrorist attack? 9/11 was an inside job, a false flag operation. Sadly, the sophistication of this operation points more towards state sponsored terrorism than a small group of bandits inside a cave. I continue to hear government and military officials saying we are fighting Al Qaeda in Iraq and globally. Does this mean as the lone superpower we supposedly were attacked by this rag tag group on September 11th and have been fighting them for the last 6 years without ‘mission accomplished’? How often have our leaders evoked the memory of 9/11 to rally our people for certain causes (i.e. Iraq)? fight on in peace. I hope you decide to investigate the truth of 9/11 for yourself. NamasteShawn Cooper PS For a summary and the best documentary of 9/11 I recommend watching Loose Change 2. You can watch it for free here- http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7866929448192753501&q=loose+change+2&hl=en or visit http://www.wtc7.net or http://www.st911.org and start your own research… Lastly, allot of the public does not know that Rosie O’Donnell and Charlie Sheen are not the only ones questioning the official story of 9/11. Hundreds of scholars, public representatives, high ranking officials and survivors are questioning it as well. please see http://www.patriotsquestion911.com for more on this.

No evidence. There’s thousands of pieces of evidence that 911 was an inside job / controlled demolistion. Larry Silverstein, John Kerry, and Rudy Giuliani even admitted it on camer!
take a look here: http://www.fight4truth.com/911truth.htm

WAKE UP! You’ve been hypnotized by the media to believe the official story of 911. Listen to the Iraq War Veteran, he knows what he is talking about. Millions of people worldwide are not lost in conspiracy theories, its others, like you, who can’t seem to break the trance. There are engineers, scholars, pilots, architects, war veterans, journalists and everyday Americans who have come out and said they don’t belive the Governments story. WHY?!? … Look here:

http://www.livevideo.com/socialservice

I cant believe there are some people still in denial that 911 was orchestrated by some part of the US government. Theres so much evidence that its a setup. For a crash course in reality i suggest you (the author) and anyone still living in the bubble they want you to stay in watch Zeitgeist (www.zeitgeistthemovie.com)
Your civil liberties are being slowly but surely eroded in the name of “terrorism”.

“There Comes a Time When Silence Is Betrayal” -Martin Luther King

Sam and Seen it all before,

A conspiracy of this magnatude is obviously hard to believe. We have all been trained to label anyone who questions the status quo, a “whacko” or a “conspiracy buff”. Honestly, since National Geographic was taken over by NewsCorp how many “fact or fiction” programs have ran on the channel. At the end of every episode those who dissent from official explanations are regarded as idiots. Is that really necessary for having a different opinion. No, but we buy it, because it is so much easier to believe, and ignorance is bliss. But I emplore you to look at the evidence deeply and with an open mind.

It is not just a couple of witnesses and fragmented circumstantial evidence. It business, plain and simple. Do you honestly believe that the bush administration cares about the well being of an average citizen like you or me. Why would they? Do you really think they have some moral fiber that makes them any different from any other crook or murderer. If you do have some evidence to show that I would like to see it.